On Thorvald Franke’s tweet I found a statement on Paulus Orosius. A copy of his works is in the Library of Sankt Gallen, Switserland. I was actually more attracted by the beauty of this Library than by Thorvald Franke’s tweet. I don’t know who Paulus Orosius was and to be honestly; I don’t care. However. Here we go again. Atlantis did not fit into the Biblical timeline. But Tertullian defended Atlantis against the Bible.
Ow really… as far as I know Plato’s Atlantis epic was badsed on oral tradition while the complete book of Genesis was based on the written toledoth. I am sure that both Thorwald Franke and Paulus Orosius had never heard of the aionian times anyway. Does the Bible not recognize Atlantis?
Well it does more, It recognizes at least 5 different aionian times with all of them a specific ordening and a new stage in an evolving Atlantis model. In the 1ste aion there was the Poseidon like serpent in Eden. In the second aion there was the City of Enoch; in the Third aion there was the city of Babylon. Then between Nimrod’s Babylon and Endtimes Babylon we find another evolution of Atlantis, growing from Kaftor/Crete tot Gaza (Pentapolis/Dagon Temples), Exodus (Souther dimension of tsaphon), Tyrus (Twin city of Babylon) and finally Babylon again. Not to forget the City of David which was the blueprint.
The Bible recognizes surely Atlantis but named it differently.
* Correction: Atlantis was divided over 3 evil aions, out of 5 aions. The last two aions are the good aions.